Incentive Structure: Should We Include Loss Target Ratio?
What has been your experience with sales incentive structures? Do you think a target loss ratio (LTR) should be incorporated to ensure that only high-quality sales are targeted? Or is it the responsibility of underwriters to handle pricing and policy acceptance? We’d love to hear your thoughts!
The question of whether to include a loss target ratio (LTR) in a sales incentive structure is a nuanced one that depends on various factors, such as company goals, market conditions, and the relationship between sales and underwriting teams.
In my experience, incorporating a loss target ratio into the incentive structure can be beneficial, particularly in industries where managing risk and maintaining quality is crucial. By including LTR, companies can encourage their sales teams to prioritize quality over quantity. This can help ensure that sales representatives focus on long-term client relationships rather than just hitting short-term targets.
However, it’s essential to strike a balance. The primary role of underwriters is to assess risk and make informed decisions on pricing and policy acceptance. If sales incentives are too heavily weighted towards LTR, it could disincentivize sales teams from pursuing new opportunities, especially if the underwriting guidelines are strict. A collaborative approach between sales and underwriting is vital, where both teams understand each other’s goals and constraints.
Ultimately, including a loss target ratio can enhance the incentive structure, provided it is done thoughtfully. It’s essential to ensure that sales teams still feel empowered to pursue new leads while being mindful of the quality and sustainability of those sales. Regular communication and alignment between departments can help achieve the right balance and drive overall business success.