Trucking company doesn’t have insurance and is trying to delay

Title: Navigating Liability and Insurance Challenges After a Highway Accident with an Uninsured Trucking Company

Introduction:
Discovering that a trucking company involved in a minor collision appears to lack valid insurance coverage can be both frustrating and concerning. If you’ve found yourself in a similar situation, understanding your options and the complexities involved is essential in protecting your interests and pursuing compensation effectively.

Incident Overview:
Recently, a vehicle was involved in a minor highway collision caused by a trucking company’s driver merging unexpectedly into their lane, resulting in approximately $11,000 in damages. The driver provided insurance details at the scene, and photographic evidence was collected. However, subsequent contact with the insurance company revealed that their policy had been terminated two months prior to the incident.

Company Insurance Status:
Further investigation via the Department of Transportation’s database indicated that the trucking company’s only active policy is with Geico Marine — a provider unlikely to cover commercial trucking operations. Industry insights suggest that some carriers attempt to bypass legal insurance requirements by maintaining policies that do not truly cover their driving activities, raising questions about their liability coverage’s validity at the time of the accident.

Timeline and Regulatory Filings:
The trucking firm filed their FMCSA form MCS-150 three days after the accident, which may be relevant when assessing their compliance and insurance status.

Strategic Considerations:
In this scenario, you might wonder whether the trucking company is simply waiting for the issue to fade or hoping to avoid responsibility altogether. Given the circumstances, consulting with an attorney experienced in transportation or personal injury law could be a wise step. They can advise whether formal legal action, such as sending a certified demand letter, or filing a lawsuit might be appropriate.

Insurance Implications:
Your father-in-law, who was driving at the time, has comprehensive coverage. However, since he was operating an Uber ride-share service simultaneously, it’s uncertain whether his personal insurance or Uber’s commercial insurance applies. This uncertainty complicates the decision to file a claim, especially considering potential policy exclusions for ride-share activities.

Additional Insurance Considerations:
There’s also the possibility that other insurance policies exist that are not immediately evident. Continuing efforts to clarify the trucking company’s coverage, perhaps through further communication or legal channels, can be beneficial.

Next Steps:
– Engage an attorney familiar with commercial vehicle accidents to evaluate your case and explore legal remedies.
– Consider sending a formal, certified letter demanding compensation.
– Carefully assess whether to involve your personal auto insurance, keeping in mind potential coverage exclusions due to ride-sharing.
– Maintain persistent communication

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *