My home insurance policy won’t renew in Aug because I have tree limbs from an oak over the house. I just talked to an arborist though and he said removing the limbs would kill the tree. He said they can do a weight reduction on the limbs to decrease the risk of damage to the house. What do I do?

Title: Navigating Tree-Related Insurance Challenges: Strategies for Homeowners

As homeowners, unexpected issues with our property can sometimes impact our insurance coverage and decisions about landscape maintenance. Recently, I faced a situation where my homeowner’s insurance policy was set to expire in August, but there was a catch: near my house, an old oak tree had branches overhanging the roof. The insurer raised concerns about potential damage caused by those limbs, which put my policy renewal in jeopardy.

After consulting with a certified arborist, I learned that removal of the overhanging branches could be detrimental to the health of the tree. The arborist explained that simply cutting off the limbs might effectively kill the tree, as it would disrupt the tree’s structure and vitality. Instead, he suggested performing a weight reduction process—carefully trimming the branches to lessen the load and reduce the risk of damage during storms or high winds.

However, this solution raises additional questions about legality and safety. In my area of Georgia, both arborists and local regulations indicate that removing these limbs could conflict with city laws, which typically protect mature trees and restrict certain types of pruning or removal.

Seeking options, I contacted two professional tree removal companies. Both are willing to cut back the problematic limbs, but I am hesitant to opt for complete removal. I prefer to preserve the tree, especially considering that full removal could lead to it being entirely taken down in the future, along with associated costs and loss of landscape value.

An alternative route to address my insurance concerns involves a formal risk assessment. The arborist believes that even in its current state, the tree poses a low risk of causing damage, and that a weighted reduction would further decrease that likelihood. Presenting a comprehensive assessment and mitigation plan to the insurance company might satisfy their safety requirements without resorting to destructive procedures.

Navigating these kinds of situations requires a balance between safety, legal compliance, and conservation. Consulting with qualified arborists and understanding local regulations are crucial steps in developing an appropriate, sustainable solution. Homeowners facing similar challenges should consider expert evaluations and clear communication with their insurers to find the best course of action that protects both their property and their longstanding landscape.


If you’re dealing with tree-related risks and insurance concerns, consider reaching out to certified arborists and local authorities to ensure your approach aligns with all legal and safety standards.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *