Hit by a dealer’s loaner car and they’re saying there was no coverage on the vehicle?

Title: Navigating Insurance Coverage Issues After an Accident with a Loaner Vehicle

In a recent incident, a family found themselves facing significant challenges after a collision involving a loaner car from a dealership. This unfortunate event unfolded when my wife was rear-ended by another driver who was using a dealership’s loaner vehicle while their own car was undergoing repairs.

After the accident, my wife promptly collected the other driver’s insurance details, which indicated coverage through Geico. We submitted a claim through our own insurance provider and also filled out an accident report. However, our insurance company faced challenges in tracking down the driver responsible for the accident, and eventually handed the investigation over to a third-party agency.

Just last night, we received a surprising letter informing us that, contrary to the initial information, the other driver did not actually have a policy with Geico. Instead, it appears that they were insured by Nation General Insurance Company. To our dismay, Nation General has denied the claim for property damage, citing that because the vehicle involved in the accident was not the driver’s personal property, there is no coverage available.

The reasoning provided by Nation General was particularly concerning: they claimed that at the time of the accident, there was no formal documentation verifying the loaner vehicle’s coverage. This raises the question—how is it possible for a driver to operate a dealership’s loaner vehicle without any insurance coverage? Shouldn’t the dealership have some type of policy in place that extends to their loaner vehicles?

Now, we find ourselves in a difficult position. It seems challenging to recover our deductible, and the prospect of pursuing legal action looms if we wish to seek reimbursement for our totaled car. However, after discussing our options, it appears sensible to allow our insurance company to continue their efforts to secure reimbursement. Given that our deductible was a manageable $500, the expense and effort of legal proceedings may not be warranted.

In conclusion, this experience has opened our eyes to the complexities surrounding auto insurance, particularly when it involves loaner vehicles. We hope our situation serves as a cautionary tale for others and encourages proactive checks on coverage when dealing with dealership vehicles. As we navigate this process, we remain hopeful for a resolution that allows us to recover our out-of-pocket expenses without unnecessary strain.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *