Seeking Advice: ACSB or CIP for Underwriter Role in Surety?
I recently began working as an underwriting admin in the surety division and I’m looking for guidance on how to effectively transition into an underwriting position in the future.
I graduated a couple of years ago with a degree in an unrelated field and spent around two years in sales before moving into my current role.
I’ve always been interested in pursuing the CIP, but after some research, it seems that the ACSB (Associateship in Canadian Surety Bonding) may offer more specialized training that aligns better with my goals.
Do you think pursuing courses is necessary for me at this stage?
I’m currently based in Alberta, Canada. Any insights would be greatly appreciated!
It’s great to hear that you’ve started your career in underwriting and are looking to advance into an underwriter position in the surety division!
When considering whether to pursue the ACSB or the CIP, it’s important to weigh the benefits of each program in relation to your career goals. Here are some points to consider:
This qualification can demonstrate your commitment and expertise in surety, making you more attractive to employers in that field.
CIP (Canadian Insurance Professional):
If you ever consider transitioning to other areas of insurance, the CIP could be beneficial.
Courses and Certifications:
Depending on your current workload and your ability to balance studies with job responsibilities, consider starting with the ACSB, as it aligns directly with your goal.
Networking and Experience:
Look for opportunities within your current role to take on additional responsibilities related to underwriting. This could include shadowing underwriters, participating in meetings, or volunteering for projects that involve risk assessment.
Continuous Learning:
Ultimately, both the ACSB and CIP have their pros and cons, but given your goal of progressing within the surety division, ACSB may be the more directly beneficial choice. Good luck on your journey towards becoming an underwriter!